Daniel Munoz-De La Nava vs Benedikt Dorsch Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L W L
Form
L L L L L L L L W LH2H: Nava 1 - 1 Dorsch
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Dorsch winning 2. The last match between Nava and Dorsch was at the Wimbledon - London, 13-06-2011, Q1 round, Grass with Daniel Munoz-De La Nava getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz-De La Nava | 1 |
| Benedikt Dorsch | 1 |
Wimbledon - London(13-06-2011)
| Nava | Stats | Dorsch |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 68 | Highest Rank | 127 |
| 43 | Age | 44 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 57% (521-389) | Career Total W/L | 58% (188-135) |
| $282,573 | Career Prize Money | $59,285 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 7-5 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 20 | Games Won | 21 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jan Choinski
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Sandro Ehrat
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Inigo Cervantes
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Nys
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Benedikt Dorsch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominik Meffert
Player
Benedikt Dorsch
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
12
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benedikt Dorsch
Player
Frank Moser
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
9
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Benedikt Dorsch
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Benedikt Dorsch
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Benedikt Dorsch
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Benedikt Dorsch
33%
(
10 of
30)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (521/389) | Win/Loss | 58% (188/135) |
| 56% (1196/927) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (417/317) |
| 53% (10683/9535) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3675/3341) |
| 56% (95/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (99/61) |
| 58% (404/291) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (36/43) |
| 47% (15/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (49/26) |
| 50% (7/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1448 | Aces Total | 169 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 73 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 593.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 565.4 |
| 57% (18965/33123) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1898/3133) |
| 70% (13232/18965) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1310/1898) |
| 51% (7210/14158) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (626/1235) |
| 42% (1469/3496) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (81/229) |
| 41% (13739/33849) | Return Points Win % | 34% (1009/2953) |
| 52% (24/22) | Slam W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 48% (11/12) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (52/52) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (14/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (294/241) | Challenger W/L | 57% (118/88) |
| 70% (140/59) | Futures W/L | 73% (46/17) |
| 58% (511/884) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (183/316) |
| 15% (2/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 49% (137/279) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (63/114) |
| 48% (145/301) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (46/89) |
| 83% (534/442) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (182/158) |
| 17% (534/91) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (182/23) |
| 21% (376/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (141/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
